The library · Quotes
Stoic quotes, verified
The short answer
Every quotation here is an exact excerpt of a public-domain translation, with the author, work, book and section, and the translator and year, so you can check it yourself. Paraphrases are labeled, and lines the Stoics never wrote have their own page.
In this guide · 7 sections
How we check every quotation
A Stoic quote is only as good as its source. Here is how the passages on this site are chosen and checked.
- One of four translations. George Long’s Meditations (1862) and Epictetus (1877), and Aubrey Stewart’s Seneca: On Benefits (1887) and the shorter dialogues (1889). All four are in the public domain.
- Word for word. Software compares each excerpt with the digitized text from Project Gutenberg. If the words don’t match, the passage is rejected before the site is built.
- Cuts are marked. Omitted words become an ellipsis (…). Sentences from different places are never joined silently.
- You can check. Each passage has a Copy with citation button and a Source text link to the full translation.
Long and Stewart wrote Victorian English: Long’s Marcus says thou and thy, and both favor long sentences. Smoother modern translations exist, and many are still under copyright, which is why a line you know may read differently here. Which translation of the Meditations to read compares them, and the full policy is in how we source the Stoics.
Twelve essential Stoic quotes
We chose these for range: four themes, three authors, and passages worth rereading. The famous lines have their own pages further down. Under each passage is a note in our own words.
The judgment is yours
Things themselves touch not the soul, not in the least degree; nor have they admission to the soul, nor can they turn or move the soul: but the soul turns and moves itself alone, and whatever judgments it may think proper to make, such it makes for itself the things which present themselves to it.
Read Long’s “soul” as the mind, the part of you that forms judgments. Marcus’s claim is that nothing outside can reach in and rearrange it: whatever a thing comes to mean for you, the mind “makes for itself” (Meditations 5.19). That is bad news if you want to blame the traffic, and good news if you want somewhere to start.
To the jaundiced honey tastes bitter, and to those bitten by mad dogs water causes fear; and to little children the ball is a fine thing. Why then am I angry? Dost thou think that a false opinion has less power than the bile in the jaundiced or the poison in him who is bitten by a mad dog?
Marcus asks himself why he is angry, and answers with a comparison. To the jaundiced, honey really does taste bitter, and a false opinion colors the world just as thoroughly for the person who holds it. The coworker who is sure you are out to get him is tasting everything through that belief. That is a reason for patience, though not for agreeing with him.
These reasonings do not cohere: I am richer than you, therefore I am better than you; I am more eloquent than you, therefore I am better than you. On the contrary, these rather cohere: I am richer than you, therefore my possessions are greater than yours; I am more eloquent than you, therefore my speech is superior to yours. But you are neither possession nor speech.
A lesson in logic as much as in ethics. From I have more the only valid conclusion is I have more: a bigger bank balance proves only that you have more money, and a better presentation proves only better speaking. Neither is a verdict on you, because “you are neither possession nor speech” (Enchiridion 44).
Being corrected
If any man is able to convince me and show me that I do not think or act right, I will gladly change; for I seek the truth, by which no man was ever injured. But he is injured who abides in his error and ignorance.
An emperor is surrounded by people with every reason to agree with him, and Marcus wrote himself a standing invitation to be contradicted. It is a good line to reread before a performance review, an argument at home or any conversation in which you are already sure you are right.
Remember that to change thy opinion and to follow him who corrects thy error is as consistent with freedom as it is to persist in thy error. For it is thy own, the activity which is exerted according to thy own movement and judgment, and indeed according to thy own understanding too.
Read this beside 6.21. It answers the fear that giving way to someone else’s argument costs you your independence. Marcus counts changing your mind as no less free than holding on to an error, because the act of accepting a correction is still yours: “it is thy own” (Meditations 8.16). Nobody can change your mind for you; when it changes, you changed it.
What is the first business of him who philosophizes? To throw away self-conceit … For it is impossible for a man to begin to learn that which he thinks that he knows. … For we have also a certain preconception of health, but we are not able to adapt it. For this reason one says, Abstain from food; another says, Give food; another says, Bleed; and another says, Use cupping. What is the reason? is it any other than that a man cannot properly adapt the preconceptions of health to particulars?
Long’s “self-conceit” translates the Greek oiēsis, the opinion that you already know. Epictetus puts discarding it first because no one can begin to learn what they think they already know. The health example makes the point concrete: everyone has a notion of health, and the advice still conflicts. In the lines this excerpt skips, he says the same of words like good and just, and defends Plato for wanting terms defined.
Bearing what happens
Nothing happens to any man which he is not formed by nature to bear. The same things happen to another, and either because he does not see that they have happened, or because he would show a great spirit, he is firm and remains unharmed. It is a shame then that ignorance and conceit should be stronger than wisdom.
The first sentence makes the claim; the rest argues for it, and the argument is less flattering than you might expect. Marcus points to people who stay firm under the same blows for poor reasons, obliviousness or a wish to look brave, and calls it a shame if wisdom can’t do what conceit manages. It is a claim about what people can bear, not a promise that bearing it will be easy.
The invulnerable is not that which is never struck, but that which is never wounded. In this class I will show you the wise man. Can we doubt that the strength which is never overcome in fight is more to be relied on than that which is never challenged, seeing that untested power is untrustworthy, whereas that solidity which hurls back all attacks is deservedly regarded as the most trustworthy of all? … just as some tall projecting cliffs break the waves of the sea, and though lashed by them through many centuries, yet show no traces of their rage; even so the mind of the wise man is firm …
Seneca’s answer to a skeptic who thinks the Stoic promise is too good to be true. He never says the wise person goes unattacked, only that attacks don’t get through, and he argues that strength which has been tested is the kind worth trusting. The wise person he describes is rare by his own account: later in the same essay he says one appears only at long intervals (chapter 7), and in On Tranquility of Mind 7 he says the search for one has gone on for centuries without success.
Everything has two handles, the one by which it may be borne, the other by which it may not. If your brother acts unjustly, do not lay hold of the act by that handle wherein he acts unjustly, for this is the handle which cannot be borne; but lay hold of the other, that he is your brother, that he was nurtured with you, and you will lay hold of the thing by that handle by which it can be borne.
A practical image for family fights and office grudges. The wrong done to you is one handle, and a situation lifted by that handle can’t be carried. The relationship is another: a brother in Epictetus’s example, a sister or a business partner or a friend of twenty years in yours. You choose where to take hold.
How to live, and with whom
Let us therefore inquire, not what is most commonly done, but what is best for us to do, and what will establish us in the possession of undying happiness, not what is approved of by the vulgar, the worst possible exponents of truth. … I do not trust my eyes to tell me what a man is: I have a better and more trustworthy light by which I can distinguish what is true from what is false: let the mind find out what is good for the mind.
“The vulgar” is Stewart’s Victorian word for the crowd, and in the lines this excerpt skips Seneca makes clear he means the crowd at every rank, the woolen cloaks and the crowns alike. His test for a way of life is not how many people follow it but whether it holds up when the mind examines it. It is worth remembering the next time a choice is defended with everyone does it.
Only consider at what price you sell your own will: if for no other reason, at least for this, that you sell it not for a small sum. But that which is great and superior perhaps belongs to Socrates and such as are like him. … What then, since I am naturally dull, shall I, for this reason, take no pains? I hope not. … for I shall never be a Milo, and yet I do not neglect my body; nor shall I be a Croesus, and yet I do not neglect my property; nor, in a word, do we neglect looking after anything because we despair of reaching the highest degree.
The excuse Epictetus answers here is still a favorite: I’ll never be great at this, so why bother? His reply uses two famous names from his world, Milo the wrestler and Croesus the king, to make a plain point. Nobody stops exercising because they won’t win at the Olympics, or stops minding their money because they won’t be the richest person alive. Being no Socrates is no reason to sell your will cheap.
Yet nothing delights the mind so much as faithful and pleasant friendship: what a blessing it is when there is one whose breast is ready to receive all your secrets with safety, whose knowledge of your actions you fear less than your own conscience, whose conversation removes your anxieties, whose advice assists your plans, whose cheerfulness dispels your gloom, whose very sight delights you! … Above all, however, avoid dismal men who grumble at whatever happens, and find something to complain of in everything. Though he may continue loyal and friendly towards you, still one’s peace of mind is destroyed by a comrade whose mind is soured and who meets every incident with a groan.
Seneca’s list of what a good friend gives you, from keeping your secrets to lifting your gloom, works just as well as a test of the friend you are. The warning at the end is about the loyal complainer: someone can be firmly on your side and still sour every day you spend together.
Quotes by topic
Each topic page gathers verified passages on one subject, with a note on each and a word on the popular lines about it that turn out not to be Stoic.
- Quotes for hard timesQuotesSeneca, Epictetus and Marcus Aurelius on adversity, courage and strength, each cited and explained.
- Quotes on angerQuotesSeneca, Marcus and Epictetus on anger in their own words, each explained, plus lines they never said.
- Quotes on deathQuotesMarcus, Epictetus and Seneca on death, verified and cited, plus the famous lines they never wrote.
- Quotes on timeQuotesSeneca, Marcus and Epictetus on time and the present, each cited and explained, plus a line they never wrote.
- Quotes on griefQuotesMarcus, Epictetus and Seneca on loss and remembering, verified and explained, plus two lines people get wrong.
For the ideas behind the lines, the guides on anger, fear and grief go further.
Famous lines, checked
Many of the most-shared Stoic quotes are not in the texts. Some are film dialogue, some are loose modern rewordings of a real passage, and some were written recently and given an ancient name. The pages below give each famous line a verdict and set the real passage beside it.
A line the checker can’t find isn’t automatically fake. Seneca’s Letters, Musonius Rufus and some chapters of the Discourses aren’t in the texts it searches, so a line credited to them may still be genuine.
- Fake Stoic quotesVerdictThe most-shared misattributed Stoic lines, checked against the texts, with a free quote checker.
- Power over your mindVerdictThe viral line checked against the Meditations, where the idea comes from, and what Marcus did write.
- The obstacle is the wayVerdictMeditations 5.20 in full, where the slogan comes from, and the half about people it leaves out.
- The happiness of your lifeVerdictThe line traced to Collier’s 1701 translation of 3.9, set beside Long’s wording and Meditations 5.16.
- Marcus on morningsVerdictMeditations 2.1 and 5.1 in full, in plain English, and the famous morning line Marcus never wrote.
- Echoes in eternityVerdictBoth Gladiator lines checked, and what Marcus actually wrote about fame and death.
Quotes by philosopher
Almost everything quoted on this site comes from three writers of the Roman imperial period, and each has a page of passages arranged by theme.
- Marcus Aurelius quotesQuotesSixteen passages from the Meditations by theme, with section numbers and how to cite them.
- Epictetus quotesQuotesEpictetus by theme in Long’s translation, with chapter numbers, and popular lines traced to source.
- Seneca quotesQuotesThirteen passages from Seneca's essays and On Benefits, the Letters in paraphrase, and viral lines checked.
Marcus Aurelius wrote the Meditations in Greek as private notes, in twelve books of short sections; Long titled his translation Thoughts. Epictetus is not known to have written anything. His student Arrian recorded the teaching as the Discourses, which survive in four of what were eight or more books (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (opens in a new tab)), and the Enchiridion, or handbook, is a short digest of them.
Seneca wrote essays, traditionally called dialogues, such as On the Shortness of Life and On Anger, as well as the long treatise On Benefits and 124 letters to his friend Lucilius. The usual English translations of the Letters are not public domain everywhere, so the Letters appear here only in labeled paraphrase. So does Musonius Rufus, the teacher of Epictetus, whose lectures survive only in reports written down by others. All four are introduced on the Stoic philosophers.
How to cite the Stoics
Cite the Stoics by their traditional numbers, not by page. A page number belongs to one printing. The book and section numbers are shared by nearly every edition and translation, so a reader with a different copy can still find the line.
| Work | Numbered by | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Marcus Aurelius, Meditations | Book and section | Meditations 6.21 |
| Epictetus, Discourses | Book and chapter | Discourses 2.17 |
| Epictetus, Enchiridion | Chapter | Enchiridion 43 |
| Seneca, On Anger, On Benefits | Book and chapter | On Anger 3.36 |
| Seneca, other essays | Chapter | On Tranquility of Mind 7 |
| Seneca, Letters to Lucilius | Letter | Letter 13 |
Scholarly editions sometimes add a third number for a paragraph, as in Discourses 2.17.1, and a few editions divide the text slightly differently. Long, for instance, prints Enchiridion 50 and 51 as one chapter, so a number that seems off by one is worth checking against a neighbor.
When you quote the words, name the translator and year as well. Marcus wrote in Greek and Seneca in Latin; the English wording belongs to the translator. Two common forms:
- In running text: “I seek the truth, by which no man was ever injured” (Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 6.21, trans. George Long, 1862).
- In a list of works: Marcus Aurelius, The Thoughts of the Emperor Marcus Aurelius Antoninus, translated by George Long (1862), Project Gutenberg eBook #15877.
Chicago style, among others, cites classical works by these numbers rather than by page, so use them with your guide’s punctuation. The Copy with citation button under every passage on this site copies the text with author, work, section, translator and year.
One passage a day
Twelve lines is a lot to take in at once. In Letter 2 to Lucilius, Seneca advises staying with a few writers and carrying away one thought from each day’s reading.
Today’s teaching works that way: one sourced passage for the date, a plain-English explanation and one practice to try before evening. In the app, the same teachings run as a 365-day path in thirteen units, starting at Day 1 on the day you begin.
Questions
What is the most famous Stoic quote?
How do you cite a Stoic quote?
What are some short Stoic quotes?
Are these quotes public domain?
Sources and translations
- Marcus Aurelius, Meditations, translated by George Long (1862). Project Gutenberg (opens in a new tab)
- Epictetus, Enchiridion, translated by George Long (1877). Project Gutenberg (opens in a new tab)
- Epictetus, Discourses, translated by George Long (1877). Project Gutenberg (opens in a new tab)
- Seneca, On the Firmness of the Wise Man, translated by Aubrey Stewart (1889). Project Gutenberg (opens in a new tab)
- Seneca, On the Happy Life, translated by Aubrey Stewart (1889). Project Gutenberg (opens in a new tab)
- Seneca, On Tranquility of Mind, translated by Aubrey Stewart (1889). Project Gutenberg (opens in a new tab)
Every quotation is checked word for word against these texts. How we source the Stoics.
Last reviewed October 5, 2026 · Report an error
IV · Repeat
Fewer quotes, more practice.
Stoic Practice pairs a sourced passage each morning with the Evening Examination at night, free on iPhone, and what you write stays on your device.
365 daily teachings · 12 guided exercises · 12 practices · Your journal stays on your iPhone
The daily practice is free. Premium adds the full guided sequence, all exercises and practices, and the archive: $6.99/month or $39.99/year (U.S.). No trial, no ads.